CI Bench

Alternatives · Result set v1 · Measured Oct 7–11, 2026 · Updated October 27, 2026

Depot alternatives for GitHub Actions runners

Measured speed and cost per job of every runner configuration in CI Bench v1, next to Depot's own published price and limits. Depot itself was not measured; the reason is below.

Short answer

Depot was not measured in CI Bench v1, so the speed and cost-per-job figures below are each option's result against GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest), not against Depot. Measured managed options: Vitko Runners (warm starts + test splitting) 2.3x faster at 84% lower cost per job; Vitko Runners 1.7x faster at 84% lower cost per job; Blacksmith 1.6x faster at 52% lower cost per job; Ubicloud 1.1x faster at 83% lower cost per job. Maintained by Vitko, Inc., which sells one of the products measured.

What Depot publishes

Not measured in CI Bench v1: Depot runners were assigned but did not start jobs for our account during the test window (checks on 2026-10-01 and 2026-10-24), so there is no measured speed or cost-per-job figure for Depot.

Depot: facts from its own pages
TopicWhat its page saysSource
Price$0.006 a minute for 2 vCPU and 8 GB, $0.012 for 4 vCPU, $0.024 for 8 vCPU; billed per second.Depot docs, runner types, read 2026-10-27
PlansDeveloper $20 a month with 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes; Startup $200 a month with 20,000.Depot pricing, read 2026-10-27
Hardware it describesEphemeral EC2 instances that are never reused; Intel runners on 4th Gen AMD EPYC Genoa CPUs, Arm runners on AWS Graviton4; a RAM-backed disk accelerator.Depot docs, overview, read 2026-10-27
Its own speed claim"Up to 3x faster than a GitHub-hosted runner" and "10x faster caching". These are Depot's claims on its own page; we did not measure them.Depot docs, overview, read 2026-10-27
Limits it statesGitHub Actions runners support only repositories owned by GitHub organizations, not personal accounts.Depot docs, overview, read 2026-10-27

Alternatives measured on 12 real CI workloads

Measured runner configurations against GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest)
ConfigurationTypeSpeed vs GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest)Cost per job vs GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest), 10,000 jobs a monthList $ per minute (2 vCPU)
Vitko Runners (warm starts + test splitting)VitkoManaged2.3x faster84% lower$0.002
Vitko RunnersVitkoManaged1.7x faster84% lower$0.002
GitHub-hosted larger runner (4 vCPU)Managed1.6x faster39% higher$0.012
BlacksmithManaged1.6x faster52% lower$0.004
Self-hosted runners on Google CloudSelf-hosted1.5x faster59% loweryour cloud bill
RunsOnSelf-hosted1.2x faster75% loweryour cloud bill
Self-hosted runners on AWS (one VM per job)Self-hosted1.2x faster60% loweryour cloud bill
UbicloudManaged1.1x faster83% lower$0.00125

Speed and cost are the indexes in results.json (geometric mean over 12 workloads, each against GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest)); list prices dated 2026-10-05. List price per minute is not cost per job; faster runners finish sooner. Self-hosted options spread fixed monthly costs over the volume.

Other providers, published facts only

When another option may fit better

More: 12 options compared · ranked by speed · ranked by cost per job · price per minute, 2 and 4 vCPU · list prices · free minutes. Alternatives to: Blacksmith · Depot · RunsOn · Ubicloud · WarpBuild · Namespace · BuildJet.

Depot's pages may have changed since October 27, 2026; they are the authority. Method: how the runs were made; data: results.json; every raw record: the repository. Maintained by Vitko, Inc., which sells one of the products measured. Page dated October 27, 2026.