Status in CI Bench
Shut down (per its own docs, read 2026-10-24).
Source: buildjet.com/for-github-actions, read 2026-10-24. The price below is the last one published on its pricing page.
List price
Read from BuildJet's own pricing page on 2026-10-24. List price per minute is not cost per job; faster runners finish sooner.| Provider | List price per minute | Billing granularity | Included minutes | Monthly or plan fees | Basis | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BuildJet not measured | $0.004 (last published; service shut down) | Per minute | One-time $5 credit (last published) | Concurrency extensions $300 a month per 100 vCPUs (last published) | Per runner size (2 vCPU, 8 GB) | 2026-10-24 | source |
BuildJet compared with Vitko Runners
Each line says whether it is a list price or a measured result- Provider list price
- $0.004 (last published; service shut down) (list price, read 2026-10-24)
- Vitko Runners list price
- $0.002 per minute, billed per second (list price, read 2026-10-24)
- List price per minute
- Vitko Runners' list price per minute is 50% lower than BuildJet's.
- Billing
- BuildJet: per minute. Vitko Runners: per second, no per-job minimum.
- Included minutes and plan fees
- BuildJet: one-time $5 credit (last published); concurrency extensions $300 a month per 100 vCPUs (last published). Vitko Runners: 2,000 minutes every month; none.
- Measured, against GitHub
- In CI Bench v1, Vitko Runners with warm starts and test splitting was 2.3× faster than GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest), and Vitko Runners had the lowest cost per job among the managed runners measured, 84% lower than GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest). These are measured results against GitHub, not against BuildJet.
- Measured, against BuildJet
- Shut down (per its own docs, read 2026-10-24). There is no measured comparison.
BuildJet vs Vitko Runners: pricing · All list prices · Measured results