CI Bench

Alternatives · Result set v1 · Measured Oct 7–11, 2026 · Updated October 27, 2026

BuildJet alternatives for GitHub Actions runners

BuildJet for GitHub Actions has shut down. These are the runner configurations measured in CI Bench v1, with speed and cost per job against GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest).

Short answer

BuildJet for GitHub Actions announced on February 6, 2026 that it was shutting down: new signups stopped that day and runners stopped running jobs on March 31, 2026; its post tells users to move to GitHub-hosted runners. Measured managed alternatives in CI Bench v1: Vitko Runners (warm starts + test splitting) 2.3x faster at 84% lower cost per job; Vitko Runners 1.7x faster at 84% lower cost per job; Blacksmith 1.6x faster at 52% lower cost per job; Ubicloud 1.1x faster at 83% lower cost per job. Maintained by Vitko, Inc., which sells one of the products measured.

What BuildJet said

BuildJet’s post “We’re shutting down BuildJet for GitHub Actions” (dated February 6, 2026, read 2026-10-27) says: new signups are no longer accepted; pay-as-you-go billing continues until March 31, 2026; on March 31, 2026 BuildJet stops running jobs; to migrate, change runs-on to ubuntu-latest (or ubuntu-24.04-arm for Arm) and replace buildjet/cache with actions/cache. Its reason, in its words: GitHub "has made substantial improvements" and "the gap we set out to fill has largely closed".

Replacements measured on 12 real CI workloads

Measured runner configurations against GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest)
ConfigurationTypeSpeed vs GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest)Cost per job vs GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest), 10,000 jobs a monthList $ per minute (2 vCPU)
Vitko Runners (warm starts + test splitting)VitkoManaged2.3x faster84% lower$0.002
Vitko RunnersVitkoManaged1.7x faster84% lower$0.002
GitHub-hosted larger runner (4 vCPU)Managed1.6x faster39% higher$0.012
BlacksmithManaged1.6x faster52% lower$0.004
Self-hosted runners on Google CloudSelf-hosted1.5x faster59% loweryour cloud bill
RunsOnSelf-hosted1.2x faster75% loweryour cloud bill
Self-hosted runners on AWS (one VM per job)Self-hosted1.2x faster60% loweryour cloud bill
UbicloudManaged1.1x faster83% lower$0.00125

Speed and cost are the indexes in results.json, each against GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest); list prices dated 2026-10-05. List price per minute is not cost per job; faster runners finish sooner. BuildJet was not measured (it was already shut down by the time of this page's release).

Switching in practice

More: 12 options compared · ranked by speed · ranked by cost per job · price per minute, 2 and 4 vCPU · list prices · free minutes. Alternatives to: Blacksmith · Depot · RunsOn · Ubicloud · WarpBuild · Namespace · BuildJet.

Method: how the runs were made; data: results.json; every raw record: the repository. Maintained by Vitko, Inc., which sells one of the products measured. Page dated October 27, 2026.