Speed
× faster than GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest) · higher is betterGitHub-hosted larger runner (4 vCPU)
1.6×
GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest)
1.0×
Cost per job
USD per $1.00 spent on GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest), at 100,000 jobs a month · lower is betterGitHub-hosted larger runner (4 vCPU)
$1.39
GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest)
$1.00
Workload by workload
GitHub-hosted larger runner (4 vCPU) had the lowest median time of the two on 12 of 12 workloads, GitHub-hosted (ubuntu-latest) on 0.
Cost by volume
Mean cost per job in USD, from the benchmark’s sensitivity results
Failed runs
Counted, never replaced- GitHub-hosted larger runner (4 vCPU)
- 3 of 360 measured runs (0.8%)
- GitHub-hosted runners (ubuntu-latest, 2 vCPU)
- 3 of 360 measured runs (0.8%)
Each configuration page lists where its failures happened. All losses.
All results for this pair
One line per configuration pairing, generated from the benchmark data- GitHub-hosted larger runner (4 vCPU) ran jobs 1.6× faster than GitHub-hosted runners (ubuntu-latest, 2 vCPU) (95% interval 1.5× to 1.6×); GitHub-hosted larger runner (4 vCPU) cost 39% more per job (at 100,000 jobs a month).